Soochi

About

Good civic work is badly indexed. The team that spent years on the problem, the dataset you assumed didn't exist, the tool that would have saved three weeks, the report that already investigated the facts, or the archive holding records everyone thought were lost — these exist. But finding them mostly depends on knowing someone who already knows. This index is an attempt to write that knowledge down.

The name

Soochi comes from the Kannada ಸೂಚಿ (sūci): among its meanings is an index of a book's chapters or subjects. That is the job here too — a small, ordered way into a much larger body of work.

The 8 kinds

Every entry is exactly one of these. The vocabulary is deliberately small — an index where each entry invents its own tags is a list, not an index.

Alongside these, 31 topics and 44 places, both closed lists. Adding a term is a deliberate edit someone reviews, which is most of what keeps the filters meaning anything.

What gets listed

In

  • Organisations doing civic, research or advocacy work
  • Open datasets, and the public portals that hold them
  • Tools and software you can run without buying anything
  • Reporting, research and publications that show their sources
  • Live dashboards tracking public data and civic indicators
  • Curated directories that point deeper into a specific domain
  • Archives, including of things that no longer exist
  • Communities you can actually join and ask questions in

Out

  • Consultancies and vendors selling into the sector
  • Products whose free tier is really a trial
  • Anything primarily promotional about itself
  • Work you cannot reach without knowing someone
  • Individual reports — we list who published them, not each PDF

Paywalled work is listed when the work itself is the point, and labelled as such. The bar is usefulness, not size or reputation.

How it stays honest

Every link is checked automatically each week. Entries that go dark are marked dormant, then dead, rather than deleted — what an organisation used to be is often worth knowing, and a directory that quietly drops its failures is lying about its own history.

Descriptions are concise editorial summaries and may be AI-assisted. Each blurb is capped at 160 characters, while longer notes can record context, caveats and uncertainty. That structure keeps the index scannable without pretending every source is equally well understood.

The data is the point

Every entry is a plain text file in a public Git repository, validated against a schema. The whole index is available as index.json under CC BY 4.0 — take it, fork it and build something better with it, with attribution. Nothing here is locked in a database that only one person can reach, and if this site disappears the index itself does not.

Who maintains it

One person, with help. The index is only as good as the number of people putting things into it — if something is wrong, out of date, or missing, say so. Corrections are as welcome as additions, and get merged faster.